<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Ways the Peer Movement Could Be Just a Little Bit Better About Avoiding Neocolonialism:	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://timdreby.com/ways-the-peer-movement-could-be-just-a-little-bit-better-about-avoiding-neocolonialism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://timdreby.com/ways-the-peer-movement-could-be-just-a-little-bit-better-about-avoiding-neocolonialism/</link>
	<description>TIM DREBY, MFT</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2020 15:11:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.1.10</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: admin		</title>
		<link>https://timdreby.com/ways-the-peer-movement-could-be-just-a-little-bit-better-about-avoiding-neocolonialism/#comment-15017</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2020 14:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://timdreby.com/?p=7609#comment-15017</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I agree, consumer is not a good word. But the one that is really my pet peeve is when people use the word folks. I am more concerned about avoiding that word. Consumer may be capitalist, but folks is kind of pimpy in a unintentional hippy kind of manner. It so irritates me. I am sorry I slipped with the consumer word and appreciate you pointing it out to me. I haven&#039;t considered it as dehumanizing as others to this point but it makes sense.

As per co-optation, I have been endlessly persecuted by peers because I work in the system and take medication and have lived and worked in communities of color. I am against forced treatment totally. But if I had meds forced on me instead of the godawful therapy I went through, I might fit in more. But if a peer who has been through more shit than me believes in forced treatment, I&#039;ll at least be curious to the story because peers come from different background classes, races and forms of incarceration and what one person is needing might be different than what others are needing. We have such a diverse society and those of us who are making generalization and speaking for all peers in there advocacy are so busy condemning and damning each other to hell for being different or selling out peer ethics need to heighten curiosity and stop infighting. I have hear many black people call the peer movement a white movement. Although I am white, I have lived and worked in communities of color and see that in the ways I am condemned for not fitting the mold. It&#039;s just as hurtful and maddening.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, consumer is not a good word. But the one that is really my pet peeve is when people use the word folks. I am more concerned about avoiding that word. Consumer may be capitalist, but folks is kind of pimpy in a unintentional hippy kind of manner. It so irritates me. I am sorry I slipped with the consumer word and appreciate you pointing it out to me. I haven&#8217;t considered it as dehumanizing as others to this point but it makes sense.</p>
<p>As per co-optation, I have been endlessly persecuted by peers because I work in the system and take medication and have lived and worked in communities of color. I am against forced treatment totally. But if I had meds forced on me instead of the godawful therapy I went through, I might fit in more. But if a peer who has been through more shit than me believes in forced treatment, I&#8217;ll at least be curious to the story because peers come from different background classes, races and forms of incarceration and what one person is needing might be different than what others are needing. We have such a diverse society and those of us who are making generalization and speaking for all peers in there advocacy are so busy condemning and damning each other to hell for being different or selling out peer ethics need to heighten curiosity and stop infighting. I have hear many black people call the peer movement a white movement. Although I am white, I have lived and worked in communities of color and see that in the ways I am condemned for not fitting the mold. It&#8217;s just as hurtful and maddening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tracy Frisch		</title>
		<link>https://timdreby.com/ways-the-peer-movement-could-be-just-a-little-bit-better-about-avoiding-neocolonialism/#comment-14994</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tracy Frisch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2020 00:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://timdreby.com/?p=7609#comment-14994</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[If you want to avoid neo-colonialism, please stop using that dreadful capitalist, dehumanizing word Consumer. Also the peer movement without advocacy is bankrupt. Here&#039;s a little true story. A friend asked me to come to his AOT (forced &quot;treatment&quot;) hearing in my county in upstate NY. I showed up, along with the other person he had invited. The judge asked who everyone was and told us it was a closed hearing, even though the subject of the proceeding had  invited us. We left. Today I called a peer organization to find out if they do any advocacy in these situations. The answer: We do not because some peers support forced treatment. God help us! Co-optation reigns.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you want to avoid neo-colonialism, please stop using that dreadful capitalist, dehumanizing word Consumer. Also the peer movement without advocacy is bankrupt. Here&#8217;s a little true story. A friend asked me to come to his AOT (forced &#8220;treatment&#8221;) hearing in my county in upstate NY. I showed up, along with the other person he had invited. The judge asked who everyone was and told us it was a closed hearing, even though the subject of the proceeding had  invited us. We left. Today I called a peer organization to find out if they do any advocacy in these situations. The answer: We do not because some peers support forced treatment. God help us! Co-optation reigns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
